Valsts sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Šampētera nams"

Pasūtītāja dati

Automatizēta pārbaude, kas balstīta uz iepirkuma dokumentiem un līgumu vēsturi. Konstatējumi šeit tiek rādīti tikai pēc tam, kad tos apstiprinājis cilvēks-recenzents; tas nav apgalvojums par pārkāpumu.

Konkurence: 3 · Specifikācija: 2 · Tīkls: 1

• Konkurence · Zems · Piesaistes projekta - būvprojekta izstrāde, autoruzraudzība un būvdarbi

  All 4 lots of this tender were awarded to a single supplier "SIA "AIMASA"".

• Konkurence · Zems · Kondicionieru, gaisa dzesēšanas iekārtu un ventilācijas iekārtu tehniskā apkope un remonts

  All 9 lots of this tender were awarded to a single supplier "SIA "Civinity Solutions"".

• Konkurence · Zems · Ugunsdzēsības aparātu tehniskā apkope, ūdensapgādes sistēmas pārbaude un ugunsdrošības un ugunsdzēsības inventāra piegāde

  All 8 lots of this tender were awarded to a single supplier "SIA BUS Latvija UD".

• Tīkls · Vidējs · Logu, durvju un stikloto starpsienu mazgāšanas pakalpojums

  Winning supplier "SIA "Tīra Māja"" was registered 112 days before this contract was concluded, well below the norm for this dataset (even the 1st percentile winner was registered 533+ days before award).

• Specifikācija · Augsts · Speciālā aprīkojuma un iekārtu piegāde

  The requirement for a minimum width of 65 cm is presented as a rigid constraint that excludes narrower, potentially more maneuverable equipment. The authority justifies this by citing stability and building constraints, but the lack of tolerance or range in a mechanical specification for mobile equipment often serves to exclude specific models that do not meet this exact threshold, despite the bidder's argument that narrower widths are functionally superior.

• Specifikācija · Augsts · Speciālā aprīkojuma un iekārtu piegāde

  The procurement authority explicitly refused to allow a minor tolerance (64cm or 63cm) for the base width of the mobile lift, despite the bidder's argument that narrower widths are technically advantageous for maneuverability. By insisting on a rigid minimum of 65cm, the authority restricts the pool of eligible equipment to specific models that meet this exact threshold, potentially excluding superior or more versatile products.