Rīgas Tehniskā universitāte

Authority facts

Automated screening based on procurement documents and award history. Findings are only shown here once a human reviewer has confirmed them; this is not an allegation of wrongdoing.

Competition: 1 · Qualification: 1 · Network: 3

• Competition · Low · Ārējo ūdens, kanalizācijas, siltuma inženiertīklu apkalpošana un remonts

  All 5 lots of this tender were awarded to a single supplier "Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Infrakom"".

• Network · Medium · Ārējo ūdens, kanalizācijas, siltuma inženiertīklu apkalpošana un remonts

  Winning supplier "SIA “Pilsētas komunālserviss” zinātniskā, ražošanas un komerciālā firma" was registered 196 days before this contract was concluded, well below the norm for this dataset (even the 1st percentile winner was registered 533+ days before award).

• Network · Low · Laboratorijas iekārtu remonti un piederumi

  "Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "FANEKS"" and "Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Biotecha Latvia"" each won different lots of this tender and share 1 owner/director name(s) in common (Šatcs Viktors), per Latvia's business register -- an unusual overlap for supposedly independent bidders splitting up the same tender's lots.

• Network · High · Neregulārie pasažieru pārvadājumi RTU vajadzībām

  "Akciju sabiedrība "Nordeka"" and "SIA "RUMBA TOURS"" each won different lots of this tender and share 4 owner/director name(s) in common (Mincis Guntis, Peršteins Genrihs, Genrihs Peršteins, Guntis Mincis), per Latvia's business register -- an unusual overlap for supposedly independent bidders splitting up the same tender's lots.

• Qualification · Medium · Projektu pieteikumu sagatavošanas pakalpojumi

  The procurement is for project application preparation services (consulting), which is not inherently related to the statutory audit services provided by licensed sworn auditors. Requiring a licensed sworn auditor company for general consulting services is disproportionate to the subject matter.