Summary
The confirmed rate counts tenders with at least one human-reviewed, confirmed integrity finding. It is a risk signal, not an accusation -- most flagged tenders have not been reviewed yet.
Authority facts
Integrity findings
6Automated screening based on procurement documents and award history. Findings are only shown here once a human reviewer has confirmed them; this is not an allegation of wrongdoing.
Competition: 5 · Specification: 1
-
Competition
· Medium
· Ēkas Rūpnīcas ielā 6, Rēzeknē, atjaunošana un pārbūve
2 of 3 received offers were rejected as unacceptable, leaving 1 valid bidder(s). This authority shows the same pattern in 5 of 13 competitive tenders (38%), well above the typical rate.
-
Competition
· Medium
· Daudzdzīvokļu dzīvojamās mājas Metālistu ielā 7, Rēzeknē, ārējo sadzīves, lietus kanalizācijas un drenāžas tīklu remonts
3 of 4 received offers were rejected as unacceptable, leaving 1 valid bidder(s). This authority shows the same pattern in 5 of 13 competitive tenders (38%), well above the typical rate.
-
Competition
· Medium
· Santehnikas preču piegāde SIA “Rēzeknes Namsaimnieks” vajadzībām
2 of 3 received offers were rejected as unacceptable, leaving 1 valid bidder(s). This authority shows the same pattern in 5 of 13 competitive tenders (38%), well above the typical rate.
-
Competition
· Medium
· Daudzdzīvokļu dzīvojamās mājas Rīgas ielā 2, Rēzeknē, balkonu atjaunošana
2 of 3 received offers were rejected as unacceptable, leaving 1 valid bidder(s). This authority shows the same pattern in 5 of 13 competitive tenders (38%), well above the typical rate.
-
Competition
· High
· Daudzdzīvokļu māju tehniskā apsekošana
9 of 10 received offers were rejected as unacceptable, leaving 1 valid bidder(s). This authority shows the same pattern in 5 of 13 competitive tenders (38%), well above the typical rate.
-
Specification
· Medium
· Daudzdzīvokļu dzīvojamās mājas Metālistu ielā 7, Rēzeknē, jumta, fasādes, cokola un pamatu remonts
The specification explicitly names a specific brand (Caparol) for the paint without providing an 'or equivalent' clause, which restricts the procurement to a single manufacturer's product line.
Recurring winners
10| Supplier | Awards | Total value |
|---|---|---|
| Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "RUVAR" | 3 | 125,999.97 EUR |
| SIA "NEXT bouw" | 3 | 114,865.21 EUR |
| Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Erbauer group" | 1 | 674,121.68 EUR |
| SIA "Ignitis Latvija" | 1 | 65,697.20 EUR |
| SIA "Pamatceļš" | 1 | 55,805.40 EUR |
| AS "VIADA Baltija" | 1 | 48,227.80 EUR |
| Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "ProofTools" | 1 | 41,999.99 EUR |
| Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "RECEPT-HOLDING LIFTS" | 1 | 23,760.00 EUR |
| Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "Griezes muiža" | 1 | 13,810.00 EUR |
| Sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību "SILTUMTEHSERVISS" | 1 | 1,088.35 EUR |